pci encryption decryption controller amd

Outside of security, I've had to deal with bugs in their 10 GbE NICs, and while I personally haven't used any of Intel's recent consumer platforms, I hear their latest attempt at a 2.5 GbE NIC has been a fiasco. Not only did I have to deal with Meltdown and Spectre and their associated performance hits (since I supported a large fleet of servers where I didn't have the luxury of hand-waving away that problem), I've also had to spend a ridiculous amount of time patching security bugs in their Management Engine. I sure as hell cannot say the same about AMD, I've lost count of the number of times I've been bit in the arse by AMD systems, I'm too old to put up with that bullshit anymore.Īnd the AMD crash guard thing is totally ridiculous, they are trying to solve a hardware issue (infinity bus errors) with software! Pity help any fools who actually rely on AMD EPYC processors to run their businesses. I can tell you right now that I cannot think of one single bug or shenanigan that has affected me at all since I built my first SandyBridge system and I'm including spectre and meltdown in that (much ado over absolutely nothing for home users/general users). But absence of bugs and shenanigans isn't one of them. There absolutely are reasons to like Intel. With the exact same bugs even, occasionally. The times are gone when Intel could re-release the same old processor design year after year after year. Now that competition is forcing Intel to design and release actually new processor architectures more rapidly and more often, brace yourself to see more bugs slip by testing. Sadly this is typical AMD nonsense that keeps me far, far away from them.

Pci encryption decryption controller amd